JV Lacrosse

Gebhardt and some middie got moved down when we played marquette, but then again they didnt have either of their coaches present and some kid from the university came and supposebly coached, so i dunno. Gebhardt's pretty solid.

thats one problem with our JV program. Our coaches for the most part are good ones, but they end up leaving after school lets out for them (They're from MU for the most part). And the coaches that stay behind, well one of them is way better than the other, i'll just say that.

any word on JV championship? Is it just for the MALL?

I was just on MAYLA's site before and it had a milwauke thing down, but it really didn't say much. Supossidly the cahmpionship is on the 3rd of June, but who knowe if it will even go down

My coach was talking about how most likely 8 teams will be in it, i dont know what that means but all that means is it probably isnt a state championship like varsity. Isnt jv conferences different than v conferences anyways?

as far as i know, this one is the 1st one we are having

It is supposed to be ranked based on the records of each team and then goes in this format
1vs.8
4vs.5
3vs.6
2vs.7

Winners of the first game play winners of the 2nd... same for the 3rd and 4th game and then the winners play eachother

The MALL JV championship is Sat during the whole state thing they've got going on that day and will be Arrowhead vs. Kettle Moraine. AHS won the first game between the two this year and it should be nice to see how they have improved this year

Jv champiosnhip 1:30, State consolation 3:30, and state championship 5:30 moved to AHS now...

Northshore shoulda beat KM. Our d couldnt stop anything. it was really pathetic. Whenever we tied it up, they scored right away. It was really hard to lose considering i had my best game that day and did everything i could to help us win including tying the game 3 times.

Arrowhead won 10-8... we played horrible and just seemed to be on the wrong side of every call with sid flanders getting a little ridiculolus... but it shouldnt have evn been close

I love it. Different generations, but we can all unite in our displeasure at Sid Flanders.

DwinsChamps wrote:

I love it. Different generations, but we can all unite in our displeasure at Sid Flanders.

not so far as dif generations but yah sid is ridiculous

Keeper33 wrote:

DwinsChamps wrote:

I love it. Different generations, but we can all unite in our displeasure at Sid Flanders.

not so far as dif generations but yah sid is ridiculous

no, dif generations is correct. our coach just loves sid

your coach love sid jones(younger guy, short kinda stocky) or sid flanders(older guy, tallish, IREFLAX liscense plate)?

is it possible for someone to like sid flanders?

Flanders is a nice guy.. it's easy to like him when off the field.

i am sure he is, it just seems we always have different opinions on the field

Well.. a ref's opinion and call on the field can't be fought and be made your way. Because then there's always the other team and it will be wrong for them. And Flanders isn't really the kind of guy who will attack one team and leave the other be. Every game i've played in that he was reffing was called fair. He loves the game, and I don't think that he'll make it so any of us hate the game.

Odyssey wrote:

And Flanders isn't really the kind of guy who will attack one team and leave the other be.

You are 100% wrong. Can anyone say Verona Alumni in BSG last year? Jaron can vouche that he quite literally made up calls such as him "never hearing of four long poles being allowed on the field.

Yea for sure. He also made up calls against Middleton where we were so many men down, we only had 2 players on the defensive end. Its quite obvious in the rule book that you lowest amount of players you can have on that end is 3, but he disregarded us.

He does have extremely bias opinions. Aside from that, he has a extreme power control issues, and as soon as he feels he does not like a team, that team will be penalized until he feels necesary.

at least there's only 1 or 2 refs like that for lax. in hockey, everywhere we go, the refs are completely one sided

Seriously? I've never noticed it at all.. but I also haven't seen him ref any other games than the ones i've played in. I'll take your word for it.. I guess he does suck. Maybe that was why he kept calling illegal procedure calls on SP's face off guys when we played them..

Once again, i'm wrong on an opinion lol.

Odyssey wrote:

Maybe that was why he kept calling illegal procedure calls on SP's face off guys when we played them..

Well SP's face off guy was sketch at times. Against Middleton in Bullrush, he did some illegal procedures, but vs Middleton in playoffs he was fine and did nothing wrong that I called at least.

tidbits wrote:

at least there's only 1 or 2 refs like that for lax. in hockey, everywhere we go, the refs are completely one sided

or in hockey u can win decisivley(sp?) and it doesnt matter... but ya definately... in the first AHS MUHS game the refs called off two AHS game winning goals... one because our player got a penalty for trippinng our own player...