| Since its not the Packers, then who? | |
|
|
Since its not the Packers, then who? | New England Patriots | | 45% | [ 5 ] | New York Giants | | 55% | [ 6 ] |
| Total Votes : 11 | | |
|
Author | Message |
---|
thedamnedfan All-Conference
Number of posts : 799 Age : 35 Location : Kansas City, Kansas Registration date : 2007-05-11
| Subject: Since its not the Packers, then who? Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:02 pm | |
| Just because no one has ever gone 19-0, Im gonna say the Patriots. | |
|
| |
Nate All-Conference
Number of posts : 570 Age : 34 Location : Stoughton Registration date : 2007-05-12
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:43 pm | |
| The Patriots.
The Giants do no deserve to be there. When Brett Favre throw 88 yards in the second half, you know something is up. Yes, they played good defense.. but it wasn't good enough for Brett to throw 88 yards. I've never been so dissapointed in Brett. | |
|
| |
RiDE Varsity
Number of posts : 448 Age : 34 Location : Duluth as of aug. 28th Registration date : 2007-05-11
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:27 pm | |
| im going giants, its more fun to watch the games, imho, when one team isnt tearing up everyone, so for that reason i hope nobody ever does it again. go giants go | |
|
| |
MUHS #30 JV
Number of posts : 216 Age : 32 Location : Syracuse NY Registration date : 2007-05-11
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:40 pm | |
| Giants defence is no match for a pats team that is riding a winning streak to the super bowl. | |
|
| |
thedamnedfan All-Conference
Number of posts : 799 Age : 35 Location : Kansas City, Kansas Registration date : 2007-05-11
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:56 am | |
| I mean, its going to be a good game, as they faced only a few weeks ago and it was close. But both teams are anticipating it more than ever.
Patriots start off with maybe a field goal to a touch down lead up through the first half, then after half they will pull ahead, 14 point spread at the most.
I hope Moss gets a TD, deserves it more than anyone, especially since he's been doubled every game for the past how many weeks? | |
|
| |
RiDE Varsity
Number of posts : 448 Age : 34 Location : Duluth as of aug. 28th Registration date : 2007-05-11
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:41 am | |
| 18-1 | |
|
| |
bigpattyboy36 All-Conference
Number of posts : 579 Age : 35 Registration date : 2007-05-12
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:59 am | |
| - RiDE wrote:
- 18-1
AAAAAAAAAAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAa karma's a bitch aint it tom brady? | |
|
| |
Guru Moderator
Number of posts : 204 Age : 38 Location : Milwaukee Registration date : 2007-06-01
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:14 pm | |
| i seriously want to know how much money was lost over this game | |
|
| |
SiouxLax All-Conference
Number of posts : 830 Age : 35 Location : Grand Forks, ND Registration date : 2007-05-11
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:24 pm | |
| - Guru wrote:
- i seriously want to know how much money was lost over this game
Or won if you went for the Giants | |
|
| |
MUHS #30 JV
Number of posts : 216 Age : 32 Location : Syracuse NY Registration date : 2007-05-11
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:55 pm | |
| they way i looked at it is its great for strahan to finally get a ring, and great for eli to have progressed....but the comercials were the only things i really payed attention to | |
|
| |
RiDE Varsity
Number of posts : 448 Age : 34 Location : Duluth as of aug. 28th Registration date : 2007-05-11
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:18 pm | |
| i just like how all the sports center anchors always seemed to pick the losing team, all but one took the cowboys over the giants, then all but 1 took the packers over the giants, so i based my prediction on the opposite of what those 5 seemed to think would happen in the superbowl | |
|
| |
thedamnedfan All-Conference
Number of posts : 799 Age : 35 Location : Kansas City, Kansas Registration date : 2007-05-11
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Tue Feb 05, 2008 1:12 am | |
| The Giants were the lowest seed in the whole playoffs, the Patriots were the highest. Biggest Superbowl upset ever? | |
|
| |
RiDE Varsity
Number of posts : 448 Age : 34 Location : Duluth as of aug. 28th Registration date : 2007-05-11
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:25 am | |
| | |
|
| |
thedamnedfan All-Conference
Number of posts : 799 Age : 35 Location : Kansas City, Kansas Registration date : 2007-05-11
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:54 am | |
| Mannings scramble to avoid being sacked and then made a pass downfield to a high catch over the head of the receiver... amazing play.
My favorite part of the night was one commercial, the E-Trade commercials with the baby making a webcam video.
http://www.spike.com/video/2938317/collection/25701/minisite/superbowl | |
|
| |
Nate All-Conference
Number of posts : 570 Age : 34 Location : Stoughton Registration date : 2007-05-12
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:28 pm | |
| My favorite was either the lizards doing the thriller dance or the Amp one where the fat guy is jumping a car with his nipples. | |
|
| |
MUHS #30 JV
Number of posts : 216 Age : 32 Location : Syracuse NY Registration date : 2007-05-11
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:35 pm | |
| Thriller was good. The Audi one towards the beginning was good too, only if you knew what it was talking about.The Bridgestones where some of the better ones this year, not to mention the NFL Story "Mr. Oboe" | |
|
| |
RiDE Varsity
Number of posts : 448 Age : 34 Location : Duluth as of aug. 28th Registration date : 2007-05-11
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:56 pm | |
| ide agree, the etrade ones were the best i thought | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Since its not the Packers, then who? | |
| |
|
| |
| Since its not the Packers, then who? | |
|