Bullrush Tournament

Lefty019 wrote:

Wasn't Andover in the championship game last year?

Yes, but my point is they were not good IMO.

I believe The final four are Arrowhead, Champlin Park (MN), St Louis Park (MN), and Andover(MN). One of the semis is Arrowhead vs St Louis Park and Andover vs Champlin Park in the other semis. Champlin park looks like a really good team...

i believe that west is in the semi finals aginst arrowhead, i think janesville beat st. louis park

LancerGK wrote:

i believe that west is in the semi finals aginst arrowhead, i think janesville beat st. louis park

They did, st. Louis park looked terrible

thats what i heard

Janesvile 12 St.Louis Park 5
Janesville 3 Regents 9 ( was 3-3 at one point, 5-2 at half)
Janesville 5 Stoughton + 3 middleton players (hummel, a dpole, and a middie) 7 or 8. Middleton had 2 guys in the whole game, besides the last few mins, hummel scored 2 or 3, and the other guy scored one?

Janesville plays La Folette
Stoughton plays Sun Par.
Arrowhead vs the Regents (still in the running)
Andover and Chap park (still in the running, don't quote me on this)
Something like this i think.
Thats all i know.

Hummel scored 2 and Kelso scored 1. That was all they did. Either way we still would have beaten you guys. I like how your whole team was complaining.

Oh right, and the middleton dpole didn't do anything either right? He was doing more than i saw out of any dpole. And of course we have a right to complain, we had the same number of players, and if we would had showed up with 3 middleton players you would be here complaining also.

I'm pretty sure I wouldn't complain. I play to play. But who cares.. it's done and over with

Nate wrote:

I'm pretty sure I wouldn't complain. I play to play. But who cares.. it's done and over with

Pretty sure you can't talk smack when you have to recruit some of the best players in the state, just to barely beat a first year varsity team. Remember last time you talked smack? Yep that's right you were wrong, lets not have that trend continue.

im pretty sure me and kelso and hummel did the bare minimum in that game, i was just lookin to set stuff up for stoughton's offense, not hummel and kelso. But yea, between the 2 offensive players they had a combined 3 goals so it really wouldn't have made a difference.

It was a 2 scored game...

Sorry guys to insert into the squabble going on...

So first off I promise we will be bringing cookies tomorrow!!!!

Ok so we have acouple teaser shots that I am putting up right now to view on our webpage.

We are going to see about moving our tent down between the fields at the one end close to the school.

I don't know if it will be possible but we are going to try.

Anyway for those of you that have seen our stuff please tell others because I know your going to like them!

Heres the link to the first gallery. They should be loaded by about 8:20pm.

http://Crossczech.smugmug.com/gallery/4882091_kcj4e#296803077_g7bnt

Ross

[quote="Nate"]Hummel scored 2 and Kelso scored 1. That was all they did. Either way we still would have beaten you guys. I like how your whole team was complaining.[/quote

Actually, their 3 goals were the difference in the game. Otherwise you would have lost. Simple math. Leave the Middleton guys at home and win games on your merit.

And i guess the other 2 times we beat u didnt mean anything?

Anyone know the exact standings as of now???

The math speaks for itself. the three goals generated by the middleton players were the difference in the game. It would have been a loss for you guys and you can't argue that.

So because we weren't ready to play the 2 times we faced you guys, you think the first time you guys aren't ready to play us, adding a few extra guys to your line up is a fair to make? Yes you beat us twice, but we didn't have to use help too. And we excepted the faith of our line up as it was, with 3 dpoles, and a very weak varsity the 2nd one. So i don't' see an argument there.

clearly stoughton was the better team. So if kelso and hummel weren't there, the rest of the team would have scored more goals... but you know what, there is no rules saying that we couldn't play so i dont know why your even arguing about it..

The Big Dipper wrote:

clearly stoughton was the better team.

That is why the ball was probably 2/3 mores on their side for the 2nd half...

relicdavis wrote:

That is why the ball was probably 2/3 mores on their side for the 2nd half...

You do realize you were practically playing Stoughton JV. Less than half of their team was varsity players, maybe hit half with the Middleton guys.

yeah that was a pretty low move. i wouldn't mind them bringing in more players if they were short, but freakin hummel?? all i gotta say is wow, you guys really know how to stack yourselves

i thought it was pretttty nice of them to ask us to play, i dont know who asked hummel and kelso but i put out a post earlier in this thread asking if anyone wanted/needed an extra d-pole for the tourny cuz my team wasn't in it...

You all need to quit crying...


Between the two of your teams, you have a combined record of 6-23. Thats like the bender cup if i've ever heard of it...

game is over lets move on... anyone know all the games for tomorrow?